youafreakyassbitch:

EXPLAIN THESE ONES ATHEISTS.

I’m not sure if David is bad at being a troll or if David is just bad at being funny.

25 Notes   youafreakyassbitchReblogged   Comment

—

(via mgibsonian)

What the heck.  I have time to kill.  I’ll try meditating “correctly”.  I’d love to see millions of gods and angels face to face.  I’m not entirely sure why I have to pass through these hoops to see these gods and angels and why they don’t just make themselves readily apparent, but who am I to question the wisdom of millions of gods?

11 Notes   mgibsonianReblogged   Comment

canisfamiliaris:

It’s Real and It’s OUR Fault

55 Notes   canisfamiliarisSource   mamaatheistReblogged   Comment

—

LOLGOP (via samuraifuckingfrog)

Nah…that would never happen.

812 Notes   samuraifuckingfrogSource   mamaatheistReblogged   Comment

anythingphotography:

The Cycle of Abuse Illustrated Through Single Photos and Multiple Models

Statistics show that 70% of people who are abused as children will grow up into adults who will in turn abuse children. A recent awareness ad campaign by Mexican organization Save the Children shared this fact in single photographs that are both creative and difficult to stomach.

The advertisements were originally published back in May 2012, and were created by Mexican agency Y&R and photographer Ale Burset.

Each one uses five models showing one individual at different stages of life. In the foreground, the individual is experiencing abuse as a child. Older versions of the abused child grow up as they walk across the background of the frame, and turn into the original abuser by the time they walk a full circle.

“70% of abused children turn into abusive adults. Donate at savethechildren.mx,” the advertisements say.

31937 Notes   petapixel.comSource   anapproachableatheistReblogged   Comment

crookedindifference:

The first image obtained from a GOES satellite (1975, October 25 16:45GMT)

Thus proving that the world really is flat.

824 Notes   WikipediaSource   we-are-star-stuffReblogged   Comment

stfuprolifers:

kor71:

If you think abortions ok, remember what Horton says.

Awkward. Dr. Seuss and his wife were really liberal and pro-choice. They’ve even threatened to sue pro-life organizations for using this quote the wrong way (the way you’re doing it actually). I guess you didn’t already know that Horton Hears a Who is about the American occupation of Japan post-WWII. He even dedicated it to his dear Japanese friend.

Mrs. Geisel (Mrs. Seuss) continued donating to Planned Parenthood and advocating for reproductive health and rights after her husband died.

28977 Notes   anapproachableatheistReblogged   Comment

Hmmph.  While I appreciate Twain’s sentiment, to be fair, for those billions and billions of years I didn’t know what I was missing, either.

132 Notes   ummagumma-Source   teachthemhowtothinkReblogged   Comment

I’m pretty sure creationists are immune to this stuff.

84 Notes   atheistjackReblogged   Comment

kmanovaere:

There is a lot of this stupidity about and it’s getting worse.

Maybe the real tragedy lies in the fact that the GOP seems to be particularly smitten by the bug, rendering them a parody of a political party.

http://kmanovaere.tumblr.com/

144 Notes   thebadgerman619Source   kmanovaereReblogged   Comment

simpleatheists:

kiranirvanna:

simpleatheists:

Remember people, the toughest opponent you’ll ever face is yourself. -Nico

The level of psychosis in that post…

There is only one appropriate reply…

Perfect example of Exactly what House was talking about here.

Ya this guy is fucking stupid. People I have talked to say he’s a classic example of the dunning-kruger effect.  And they couldn’t be more right.  In some video of his he said “not to toot my own horn, but i think i’m the smartest guy i know”.  

This is…disturbingly disturbed.  I’m not even sure what the Creationism dude thinks his logic is.

Is it impossible for God to exist?  Then correct answer “we don’t know”.  By what we know of logic and physics, the God traditionally discussed is certainly impossible.  As for some other form of deistic god, nothing we know about science indicates that such a being would be possible, but, since we don’t know everything there is to know, we can’t completely rule out the possibility.

Is it possible for God to unambiguously reveal himself?  This would certainly fall under the definition of what an all powerful god could do, but then it begs the question of “if he exists, then why hasn’t he?”  And if a God indeed turns out to be an impossibility, then the question is moot.

29 Notes   simpleatheistsReblogged   Comment

i-am-an-atheist:

Pastafarians - 1 Atheists - 0

piles of atheism

218 Notes   i-am-an-atheistReblogged   Comment